Does having a C-section make for bad bonding?

I’m not the first person to comment on this study and I probably won’t be the last, either. Others have commented upon its most obvious flaw: the small sample size (6 women in each group) makes it impossible to determine whether the results are significant or the result of random chance. But having read the full-text article (sent me by a reader – thank you 🙂 ), I find myself asking even more questions about the validity of the study design and their hypothesis:
Continue reading